- In the light of ongoing, and continuous development of defence and war architecture, the question arises as to the ability of architecture to exert influence in the opposite direction. Jerusalem, Israel and Palestine seem to present a good example in two respects. On the one hand, the existence of architecture of war, on the other hand, a deep desire for peace.
- Nowhere else does architectural planning seem to be so closely linked to political decisions and statements, as in this part of the Middle East. Assuming that every construction, i.e. any house, village or city, is tantamount to a political act, thus constituting a political statement, capable even of offensive action, the question arises, whether aggressive spaces can be converted. It seems as if the architect strives to realize policies, but at the same time wishes to negate the impact of his influence, and to remove himself from responsibility. Thus, if neutrality is not possible, taking position remains the only consequence.
- This outline draws form the roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It presents a submective view of factors, displayed in image and word that seem to bear signifcance for a transformation and the creation of a space. It will present models for possible solutions of the conflict, and visions of the future, thus creating a foundation for an architectural interpretation: Is there a symmetry between architecture as instrument of warfare, and architecture as an instrument of peace making? Is architecture perhaps even capable of initiating peace processes? Can architecture take on a meditative character, or even be used as a mediator?
- The location chosen for the implementation of the design is politically outstanding, itself fulfilling certain preconditions towards an archictecutre of peace. It is situated at the entrance to Jerusalem, the core of the conflict. At this site, a Jewish and an Arab village are facing each other geographically. At the same time they are divided by political architecture. The valley separting Mevasseret and Beit Surik, hitherto freely accessible to all, may become the site of a transformation of the political space that will counteract the developing polarity.
- This location will be understood as an intial point, from where the separation barrier starts dissolving into the city of Jerusalem, until by the year 2050 the current function of the Separation Barrier will be reversed and transformed, as Jerusalem will have a true chance to become a vibrant, just and mulicultural city free of war, hatred and barriers.
